Roat v. Frear
Roat v. Frear
167 Pa. 614; 31 A. 861; 1895 Pa. LEXIS 957
Roat v. Frear
Opinion of the Court
The only specification of error is an extract from the learned trial judge’s charge, directing a verdict in favor of defendant. By agreement of counsel for the parties, the statement signed by them, embracing an extract from defendant’s testimony, etc., has been printed in appellant’s paper-book “in lien of the evidence taken at the trial.” That necessarily excludes from consideration any evidence or allegations of fact not contained in the agreement. In view of the facts thus agreed upon, there appears to be no error in directing a verdict for defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.