Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895

McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance

McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 29, 1895 · Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Stbrrett, Williams
168 Pa. 1; 31 A. 875; 1895 Pa. LEXIS 750

McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

There appears to be no substantial error either in the learned referee’s findings of fact or in his conclusions of law. His very able and exhaustive report is an ample vindication of his rulings. There was therefore no error in overruling the exceptions and directing judgment for plaintiff in accordance with the referee’s findings.

Judgment affirmed.

MCGONIGLE V. AURORA EIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Per Curiam, April 29, 1895 :

By writing, signed by counsel for the parties and filed in this case, it was agreed that the decision to be rendered in Patrick McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mut. Fire Insurance Co., No. 455, January term, 1895, shall control and determine the appeal in this case, and be decisive of all questions arising out of the same.

*16In an opinion, just filed in that ease, the judgment has been affirmed; and pursuant to the terms of said agreement the judgment in this case should also be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.