Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895

Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R.

Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 6, 1895 · Dean, Fell, Green, Mitchell, Sterrett
168 Pa. 19; 31 A. 950; 1895 Pa. LEXIS 752

Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

An examination of this record with special reference to the specifications, discloses no substantial error. The questions involved, — so far as they are material, — have been sufficiently considered and correctly decided by the learned president of the common pleas. It is unnecessary to add anything to what has been said by him in his opinion on the questions of law reserved, etc., and on that opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.