Fereday v. Mankedick
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Fereday v. Mankedick, 172 Pa. 535 (Pa. 1896)
34 A. 46; 1896 Pa. LEXIS 807
Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterkett, Williams
Fereday v. Mankedick
Opinion of the Court
A careful examination of the record, including the able and exhaustive report of the learned master, has convinced us that his findings of fact as well as his conclusions of law are substantially correct, and fully justified the decree from which this appeal was taken. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires special'notice. Neither of them is sustained.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendant.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Benjamin Fereday and Herman Pry v. Francis Mankedick
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Streets — Plan of lots — Deed—Obstruction of street. Where a person takes a deed for a lot, and the deed refers to a plan of lots showing the lot purchased abutting on a street designated by name, and the purchaser subsequently buys other lots at sheriff’s sale, and the sheriff’s deeds refer to the same plan, and the purchaser resells these lots, and in his deeds refers to the same plan, he cannot close up the street adjoining his lot, if the other lot owners object.