Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark
Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark
173 Pa. 361; 34 A. 56; 1896 Pa. LEXIS 708
Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark
Opinion of the Court
It is unnecessary to cite authorities to show that the only question presented in this case was concluded by the final decree of this court in Clark’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 435. The question of costs, including of course the master’s fee now complained of, was directly involved in that case and must now be regarded as rem adjudicatam.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.