Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896

Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark

Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 27, 1896 · Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
173 Pa. 361; 34 A. 56; 1896 Pa. LEXIS 708

Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

It is unnecessary to cite authorities to show that the only question presented in this case was concluded by the final decree of this court in Clark’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 435. The question of costs, including of course the master’s fee now complained of, was directly involved in that case and must now be regarded as rem adjudicatam.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.