Lafferty v. Corcoran

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania April 6, 1896

Lafferty v. Corcoran, 175 Pa. 5 (Pa. 1896)

34 A. 308; 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1196

Dean, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the decree of tbe court below discharging defendant’s “ rule to show cause why the writ of attachment should not be quashed and attachment dissolved,” etc.

In the absence of any statutory authority for an appeal in such cases we have no power to review the action of the court below in the premises.

The writ of appeal is therefore quashed at appellant’s costs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles H. Lafferty and Rose E. Lafferty, Executors and Trustees of the last will and testament of Charles Lafferty v. Patrick J. Corcoran
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published
Syllabus: Appeals — Attachment under act of March 17, 1869, Practice, 8. O. Ro appeal lies from a decree discharging defendant’s rule to show cause ■why a writ of attachment issued under the act of March 17, 1869, P. L. 8, should not he quashed and attachment dissolved.