Mahon v. Norton
Mahon v. Norton
Opinion of the Court
All that is necessary to be said in relation to the questions involved in this contention will be found in the clear and convincing opinion of the learned president of 34th judicial district who specially presided at the hearing. We have no doubt as to the correctness of his general conclusion recited in the first specification of error, the substance of which is, that the county
The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned trial judge, and the appeal is dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J. Harold Mahon v. Patrick T. Norton, Thomas M. Dullard and Thomas Smith, County Commissioners of Luzerne County
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- County commissioners — Luzerne county— Wilkes-Barre— Courthouse — ■ Public square. The county commissioners of Luzerne county have a right to erect and maintain on the public square in the city of Wilkes-Barre, upon the location of the present courthouse, a new and enlai’ged courthouse of sufficient size to accommodate the business of the county.