Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896

Pender v. Raggs

Pender v. Raggs
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 9, 1896 · Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
178 Pa. 337; 35 A. 1135; 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1174

Pender v. Raggs

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff’s right to recover in this case depended on questions of fact which were for the exclusive consideration of the jury; and they were accordingly submitted to them by the learned president of the common pleas with full, clear, well guarded *342and accurate instructions, under which they rendered a'Verdict that has impliedly settled every material question of fact in plaintiff’s favor. There appears to be no error in any of the court’s rulings or instructions. The case was ably and accurately tried and the judgment entered on the verdict should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.