Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897

Jackson v. O'Hara

Jackson v. O'Hara
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 8, 1897 · Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
183 Pa. 233; 38 A. 624; 1897 Pa. LEXIS 746

Jackson v. O'Hara

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the judgment entered by the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. For reasons given by the court we think there was no error in “holding that the facts set forth in the defendants’ affidavit of defense ” do not constitute a defense to the plaintiff’s cause of *238action; and hence there was no' error in making the rule for judgment absolute.

The judgment is affirmed for reasons given in the opinion of .the court below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.