Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898

Huston v. Regn

Huston v. Regn
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 17, 1898 · Cueiam, Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett
184 Pa. 419; 39 A. 208; 1898 Pa. LEXIS 912

Huston v. Regn

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

There is no substantial error, either in the findings of fact or in the legal conclusions on which the modified decree in this case is predicated; nor is there anything in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

For reasons given by the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the common pleas the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at defendant’s costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.