Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215 (Pa. 1899)
43 A. 207; 1899 Pa. LEXIS 805
Fell, Green, McColltjm, Mitchell, Sterrett
Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co.
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from the decree of the court below discharging the defendant’s rule “ to show cause why the service of the bill of complaint in the above cause on John H. Klock,” etc., “ should not be set aside.”
The decree in question is clearly interlocutory, and no appeal lies therefrom to this or any other court at the present stage of the cause. The motion to quash must therefore be sustained.
Appeal quashed, at appellant’s costs, and record remitted with a procedendo.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John G. Platt v. The Belsena Coal Mining Company
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeals—Interlocutory order—Quashing appeal. An order discharging a defendant’s rule to show cause why the service of a bill in equity on a person named as defendant’s agent should not be set aside is an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies.