Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900

Jermyn v. McClure

Jermyn v. McClure
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 26, 1900 · Dean, Fell, Gbeen, McCollum, Mitchell
195 Pa. 245; 45 A. 938; 1900 Pa. LEXIS 621

Counsel

Samuel B. Pfiee and Ira H. Burns, with them Bussell JDimmiek, for appellants, Everett Warren and A. 0. Furst, with them Edivard K. Willard and Henry A. Knapp, for appellees

Jermyn v. McClure

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Having given a most minute and painstaking study to the master’s report, and the opinion of the learned court below in this case, we have reached the conclusion that the opinion of the court contains the correct exposition of the facts in evidence and of the conclusions of law which control the determination and application of the facts in view of the various contentions of the parties. The chief controversy upon the question of the parol exchange, as to which the master and the court differ in their conclusions, is in our opinion, clearly and correctly determined by the court. The reasons given in support of that conclusion are entirely satisfactory to us, and without indulging in any repetition of them here we adopt the opinion as the expression of our views upon the whole case and on it we affirm the final decree.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.