Morris v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Morris v. Philadelphia, 195 Pa. 372 (Pa. 1900)
45 A. 1068; 1900 Pa. LEXIS 648
Brown, Dean, Fell, Green, Mestrezat

Morris v. Philadelphia

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff, Mrs. Morris, trod upon a brick in a slight depression in the pavement, and it. turned under the pressure of her foot sufficiently to cause her to fall. There was no evidence to show that the brick was out of its position then, or at any time before, but it had become slightly loosened, a circumstance which may easily happen at any time in any part of the city. To hold the city liable in damages for every trivial accident of this kind would be to adopt a measure of liability quite unheard of, and entirely too severe for the ordinary administration of municipal affairs. The possibility of occasional, injury in such circumstances is one of the inconveniences of residence in large and populous cities to which the citizen must submit.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Negligence—Muncipalities—Sidewalk. The fact that -a brick in a slight depression in a sidewalk becomes slightly loosened, without getting out of position; is not sufficient to charge the city with liability for damages for personal injuries to a woman who treads upon the brick, which turns under the pressure of her foot, and causes her to fall.