Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901

Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works

Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided June 4, 1901 · Brown, McCollum, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter
199 Pa. 646; 49 A. 339; 1901 Pa. LEXIS 672

Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The testimony introduced by the litigants required the sub*647mission of the case to the jury. It follows that if there was no error in the charge or in the answers to the defendants’ third, sixth and seventh points, the verdict rendered and the judgment entered thereon should be sustained. An examination of the charge, and of the answers to the points referred to, have not convinced us of error in either. We therefore dismiss the specifications and affirm the judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.