Bailey v. Wayman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Bailey v. Wayman, 201 Pa. 249 (Pa. 1902)
50 A. 767; 1902 Pa. LEXIS 816
Brown, Ctjeiam, Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter
Bailey v. Wayman
Opinion of the Court
The assignments of error relate to the charge of the court, to the answer to the plaintiff’s first point and to the answer to the defendant’s third point. Tn the answers to the points referred to we have not discerned any perceptible error, and the same may be said of the charge of the court. It follows that
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Contract—Performance—Evidence. In an action to recover the price of certain plates to be used on tables for the polishing and grinding of glass, a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff will be sustained where it appears that the plates were to be cut according to patterns provided by defendant, and to be finished to a rolling mill finish, and the evidence for plaintiff tends to show that the plates were cut and finished according to the patterns as nearly as was practicable with the usual machinery of a rolling mill. In such a case, if the plates were made according to the contract, it was immaterial that they did not fit the tables.