Hall v. Simpson
Hall v. Simpson
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff’s testimony established two things only: the mere fact of the accident, and that the ventilating fans were
The judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Negligence — Mines and mining — Mine inspector — Mine foreman — Act of May 15, 1893, P. L. 52. In an action by a child against amine owner to recover damages for the death of her father caused by an explosion in a mine, a nonsuit is properly entered where the evidence for the plaintiff establishes two things only, the mere fact of the accident, and that the ventilating fans were not run day and night, it appearing that, except in abandoned rooms where workmen were forbidden to go, gas was found in the mine at intervals only, that the failure to run the fans constantly was only one of a number of causes that might account for the presence of the gas in the mine at the time of the accident, that the constant running of them would not have been effective unless the course of the air currents within the mine had been properly directed, and that this was a matter committed by the act of assembly to the mine inspector, over whom the employer had no control and for whose neglect he was not liable.