Nesinger v. Clay & Hinkletown Turnpike Co.
Nesinger v. Clay & Hinkletown Turnpike Co.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In Schload v. Clay & Hinkletown Turnpike Co., 192 Pa. 40, this court decided nothing. The case was argued after the death of Justice Williams, and our Brother Bbown, who succeeded had been of counsel, so that the court was necessarily limited to six judges and these were divided equally on the question of affirmance or reversal. No opinion was intimated
Decree affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Nesinger v. Clay & Hinkletown Turnpike Company
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Equity —Laches—Turnpike companies. Where a turnpike company abandons its road, and the township supervisors thereupon maintain the road for several years, and subsequently a new turnpike company is organized, takes possession of the road, expends money upon it and erects toll gates, the supervisors cannot, after the expiration of sixteen years from the time when the new company took possession of the road, maintain a bill in equity against it to restrain it from the use of the road until it had reimbursed the supervisors for the expenditures which the latter had made upon it.