Rose v. Beaver County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Rose v. Beaver County, 204 Pa. 372 (Pa. 1903)
54 A. 263; 1903 Pa. LEXIS 810
Browe, Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Pee, Potter
Rose v. Beaver County
Opinion of the Court
We have reviewed the disposition made by the common pleas of Beaver and the Superior Court of the several questions raised by the appellants, and affirm the decree appealed from on the opinion of the Superior Court, 20 Pa. Superior Ct. 110, where Judge Beaver clearly demonstrates the constitutionality of the Act of June 4, 1879, P. L. 78, and “which” he properly says, “ under various phases, constitutes the real bone of contention in the case.”
Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.
Reference
- Cited By
- 13 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Constitutional law—Title of act—General and local legislation—Poor law. The Act of June 4,1879, P. L. 78, entitled “ An act to create poor districts, and to authorize purchase of lands and erection of buildings to furnish relief and give employment to the destitute, poor and paupers in this commonwealth,” is not unconstitutional.