Philadelphia v. Johnson
Cases that cite this one
28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- American Bowling Club, Inc. v. Kanefsky (Pa. 1952)
- Scott Factors, Inc. v. Hartley (Pa. 1967)
- Dozor v. Crown Construction Co. (Pa. 1956)
- Weinroth v. Loev (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1951)
- Martin v. Parks (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1944)
- Harr, Secy., Etc. v. Furman (Pa. 1942)
- Nichols v. Gasborro (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas 1935)
- Flowers v. Exton (Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas 1932)
- Susquehanna County Treasurer v. Wright (Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas 1923)
- Bancorp Bank v. Mancini (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 2013)
- Keiper v. Keiper (Pa. Super. Ct. 1985)
- Huestis v. Cohen (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas 1964)
- Maricic v. Slesser (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas 1942)
- Markeim-Chalmers-Ludington, Inc. v. Mead (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Frederick (Pa. Super. Ct. 1930)
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Frederick (Union County Court of Common Pleas 1929)
- Grakelow v. Kidder (Pa. Super. Ct. 1928)
- Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. Potts (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Disanto v. Rowland (Pa. Super. Ct. 1924)
- Essrig v. Greenburg (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1924)
- Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc. (Pa. 1921)
- Fogerty v. Dix (Pa. Super. Ct. 1920)
- Johnson v. Philadelphia (Pa. Super. Ct. 1916)
- Mars National Bank v. Hughes (Pa. 1914)
- Heeren v. Remington (Pa. Super. Ct. 1911)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Under the power of attorney delivered in this case a judgment was entered June 5, 1902. As the learned judge of the Superior Court has clearly shown, on both reason and authority, that act was an exhaustion of the power conferred by the warrant. The confession of the second judgment on the same warrant was a nullity.
The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Smith in his opinion filed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.