Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905

Commonwealth v. Hine

Commonwealth v. Hine
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 30, 1905 · Biiown, Elkin, Fell, Mesteezat, Mitchell, Pottee, Stewabt
213 Pa. 97; 62 A. 369; 1905 Pa. LEXIS 379

Commonwealth v. Hine

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.

*100The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed in accordance with law.

Per Curiam,

October 80, 1905 :

Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.