Reeser v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
Reeser v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
215 Pa. 136; 64 A. 376; 1906 Pa. LEXIS 750
Reeser v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
The learned judge below found that the agreement with Ruth was valid as to him and binding on the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company as the successor of the Lebanon Valley Railroad Company, the original party. But he also found that Krick, the other defendant, as an adjoining landowner, had a statutory right to connect with the railroad by a switch or siding of which he could not be deprived by any agreement of the railroad with a third party.
The judgment is affirmed on so much of his opinion as covers this branch of the case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.