Wharton's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Wharton's Estate, 218 Pa. 296 (Pa. 1907)
67 A. 414; 1907 Pa. LEXIS 506
Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrkzat, Mitchell, Potter, Stewart

Wharton's Estate

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The auditing judge below found, inter alia, that “itnot only does not appear that the claimant’s mother and Edward Wharton were ever actually married, but it does not appear *298that they ever lived together as man and wife or were recognized as or held themselves out to be man and wife.

And being of the opinion that legitimacy is based upon marriage — that it is only upon the presumption of marriage that legitimacy may be found — and that the facts upon which to base a doubt which appearing must and would be construed in favor of claimant are not present in this case — the auditing judge dismisses the claim.”

On this finding approved by the court in banc, the decree is affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Decedent’s estate — Illegitimates—Marriage—Evidence. A declaration in a father’s will that a boy named therein is “my son” is not in itself sufficient to support the legitimacy of the boy so as to enable him to participate in a portion of an estate left by his deceased father’s brother, where there is nothing to show that the testator and the boy’s mother were ever actually married, or that they ever lived together as man and wife, or were recognized as, or held themselves out to be, man and wife.