Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907

Gandy v. Pinkerton

Gandy v. Pinkerton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 7, 1907 · Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orladv, Orlady, Porter, Rice
34 Pa. Super. 87; 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 84

Gandy v. Pinkerton

Dissenting Opinion

Morrison, J.,

dissenting:'

This case does not materially differ from Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 79, in which I have this day filed a dissenting opinion, and for the reasons there stated, I would reverse the judgment in this case with procedendo.

Head and Beaver, JJ., concur in this dissent.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

In an opinion filed tiiis day in Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 79, the question involved in this case is disposed of, and inasmuch as the affidavit in that case is more adequate in its statement of the defense, it is not necessary to repeat what is therein said.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.