Gandy v. Pinkerton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Gandy v. Pinkerton, 34 Pa. Super. 87 (Pa. 1907)
1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 84
Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orladv, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Gandy v. Pinkerton

Dissenting Opinion

Morrison, J.,

dissenting:'

This case does not materially differ from Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 79, in which I have this day filed a dissenting opinion, and for the reasons there stated, I would reverse the judgment in this case with procedendo.

Head and Beaver, JJ., concur in this dissent.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

In an opinion filed tiiis day in Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 79, the question involved in this case is disposed of, and inasmuch as the affidavit in that case is more adequate in its statement of the defense, it is not necessary to repeat what is therein said.

The judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published