Murphy v. McMullin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Murphy v. McMullin, 219 Pa. 506 (Pa. 1908)
69 A. 70; 1908 Pa. LEXIS 611
Brown, Fell, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter, Stewart

Murphy v. McMullin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The memorandum offered as well as the books by which it was to be followed, was in defendant’s own interest. It was not part of the res gestae, for several reasons, the principal and conclusive one of which was that it was a secret act of the defendant of which the other party had no notice and therefore could not under any rule be supposed to acquiesce in by silence. The cases where such declarations or memoranda become evidence are where the claim is challenged as an afterthought and it becomes material to show that it was, as it purports to be, cotemporary with the transaction.

. The other matters in the case were questions of fact for the ¡Fry.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Contract — Sale—Evidence—Memorandum charge — Res gestee. On the trial of an issue to determine whether the defendant had or had not sold certain stock to the plaintiff, it is proper to exclude an offer on the part of the defendant of a memorandum charge handed by the defendant to his bookkeeper at the time of the alleged sale, to be followed by the books in which the charge was entered. Such a memorandum is not a part of the res geste, but is a secret act of the defendant of which the plaintiff had no notice, and could not be supposed to have acquiesced in by silence.