Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.
Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.
221 Pa. 655; 70 A. 1103; 1908 Pa. LEXIS 545
Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
These eases arose out of the same accident as the case of Beckman v. Railway Co., 219 Pa. 26, and are governed by.it. .For the reasons there stated the judgment in each case.is re-„ versed and it is directed' that judgment be entered for the defendant in each non obstante veredicto.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.