Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911

Siegel v. Megraw

Siegel v. Megraw
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 17, 1911 · Brown, Elkin, Fell, Potter, Stewart
232 Pa. 13; 81 A. 84; 1911 Pa. LEXIS 667

Siegel v. Megraw

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The learned judges of the common pleas carefully considered the testimony in support of the rule to show cause *14why the report of the arbitrators should not be set aside, and found that the allegations of misconduct were not sustained. This finding appears to be fully sustained by the testimony. Nothing short of clear error would warrant us in disturbing it.

The order of the court discharging the rule is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.