Siegel v. Megraw

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 17, 1911

Siegel v. Megraw, 232 Pa. 13 (Pa. 1911)

81 A. 84; 1911 Pa. LEXIS 667

Brown, Elkin, Fell, Potter, Stewart

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The learned judges of the common pleas carefully considered the testimony in support of the rule to show cause *14why the report of the arbitrators should not be set aside, and found that the allegations of misconduct were not sustained. This finding appears to be fully sustained by the testimony. Nothing short of clear error would warrant us in disturbing it.

The order of the court discharging the rule is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Reference

Status: Published
Syllabus: Arbitration — Findings of fact as to misconduct of arbitrators — Review. Findings of fact by the court of common pleas that arbitrators were not guilty of alleged misconduct, will not be reversed by the appellate court, if such findings are based upon sufficient testimony, and there is no manifest error.