Bradney v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Bradney v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Opinion of the Court
While standing at a street crossing the plaintiff signaled the motorman of an approaching car to stop. He saw the power turned off, the brakes applied and the speed reduced, and as the car reached the crossing and was running slowly, he attempted to get on the front platform. He succeeded in getting his feet on the lower step and was in the act of raising one of them to the platform, when he was thrown off by the motion of the car, which was accelerated by turning on the power. His reason for not waiting until the car stopped was that he thought it would stop before the back platform came in line with the crossing and he would be obliged to walk in the snow to reach it. If it be assumed that the motorman was negligent in turning on the power, the plaintiff’s right to recover was defeated by his own negligence in attempting to get on a moving trolley car. If he had escaped the consequences
The judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bradney v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Negligence — Street railways — Getting on mowing car — Contributory negligence. In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries binding instructions for the defendant are proper where the evidence shows that the plaintiff in attempting to get on the platform of a moving car succeeded in getting his feet on the lower step, and was in the act of raising one of them to the platform when he was thrown off by the motion of the car, which was accelerated by turning on the power.