Yaukey v. Coffman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Yaukey v. Coffman, 240 Pa. 425 (Pa. 1913)
87 A. 706; 1913 Pa. LEXIS 688
Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschzisker
Yaukey v. Coffman
Opinion of the Court
The only part of the will of the testator to be considered in determining whether the plaintiff could convey a fee simple estate is: “Item: I give and bequeath to my daughter Annie E. intermarried with John Wiil Yaukey during her natural life and at her death, to be equally divided between'her heirs of issue the property known as the Railroad property.” The evident intention of the testator was that the heirs of his daughter
The judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Wills — Construction—Rule in Shelley’s Case. Testator provided by will: “I give and bequeath to my daughter A. E., intermarried with J. W. Y., during her natural life and at her death to be equally divided between her heirs of issue the property known as the Bailroad property.’’ Held, the daughter took a fee tail under the rule in Shelley’s Case; enlarged by statute •into a fee simple.