Yaukey v. Coffman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Yaukey v. Coffman, 240 Pa. 425 (Pa. 1913)
87 A. 706; 1913 Pa. LEXIS 688
Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschzisker

Yaukey v. Coffman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The only part of the will of the testator to be considered in determining whether the plaintiff could convey a fee simple estate is: “Item: I give and bequeath to my daughter Annie E. intermarried with John Wiil Yaukey during her natural life and at her death, to be equally divided between'her heirs of issue the property known as the Railroad property.” The evident intention of the testator was that the heirs of his daughter *427should take by descent from her and not as purchasers from him. This under the rule in Shelley’s case gave her an estate tail enlarged by statute into a fee simple.

The judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Wills — Construction—Rule in Shelley’s Case. Testator provided by will: “I give and bequeath to my daughter A. E., intermarried with J. W. Y., during her natural life and at her death to be equally divided between her heirs of issue the property known as the Bailroad property.’’ Held, the daughter took a fee tail under the rule in Shelley’s Case; enlarged by statute •into a fee simple.