McGarrity v. McMahon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
McGarrity v. McMahon, 240 Pa. 553 (Pa. 1913)
87 A. 781; 1913 Pa. LEXIS 714
Brown, Elkin, Mes, Moschzisker, Potter, Trezat

McGarrity v. McMahon

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

While the court below gave no reason for refusing fo open the judgment against the appellant, it is safe to assume that her petition was dismissed because it appeared from the depositions that she had given her obligation to the appellee as an original undertaking on her part, for a valuable consideration passing directly to her, and not for an antecedent debt of her husband. It is for this reason that the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Reference

Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Husband and wife — Wife as surety for husband — Judgments— Opening judgment. 1. Where a wife gives a judgment note, although she thereby discharges a debt owing by her husband, she is liable upon the same, where it appears that it was given as an original undertaking for a valuable consideration passing directly to her. 2. Upon a rule to open judgment entered upon a judgment note given by defendant, a married woman, to plaintiff, it appeared that the defendant’s husband, who was a retail liquor dealer, was indebted to plaintiff; that by reason of the husband’s convicton of homicide, it became necessary for him to dispose of his liquor license; that arrangements were made whereby the wife was to take over the liquor business and the license, and the plaintiff agreed to assist her in securing a transfer of the liquor license and in procuring possession of the premises where the business was conducted, and to give her credit for liquors which she was to buy from him, all of which he did, and the defendant wife agreed to give plaintiff a judgment note for the same amount as the money owing by her husband, the judgment note of the husband to be surrendered. Held, the judgment note given by the wife in pursuance of this arrangement was an original undertaking, for a valuable consideration passing directly to her, and the rule to open judgment was properly discharged.