Ziserman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Ziserman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
241 Pa. 13; 88 A. 80; 1913 Pa. LEXIS 728
Ziserman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Opinion of the Court
The first, second, third and fourth assignments of error cannot be considered, as no exception was taken to the charge: Lindsay v. Dutton, 227 Pa. 208. Plaintiff’s sixth point was properly refused. The duty that rested upon the defendant was the exercise of due care under the circumstances — not greater than they required.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.