Gemmell v. Fox
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Price v. Grencavage (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987)
- Mannear v. Luzerne County Institution District (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas 1957)
- Ladd v. Reynolds (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas 1954)
- Downing v. Erie City School District (Pa. 1948)
- Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. Chenowith (Md. 1942)
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Chester School District (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas 1966)
- Regan v. Stoddard (Pa. 1949)
- Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com. (Pa. 1938)
- Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com. (Pa. 1938)
- Wilson v. Philadelphia School District (Pa. 1937)
- Shenkin v. Schermerhorn (Philadelphia County Municipal Court 1933)
- Philadelphia Record Co. v. Curtis-Martin Newspapers, Inc. (Pa. 1931)
- Loganton Borough Poor District v. Clinton County (Clinton County Court of Common Pleas 1931)
- Wey v. Ben Avon Borough School District (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas 1930)
- Tillotson v. Leroy Township School District (Bradford County Court of Common Pleas 1926)
- Casinghead Gas Co. v. Osborn (Pa. 1921)
- Brock v. Atlantic Refining Co. (Pa. 1920)
- Bailey v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n (Pa. 1919)
- Beetem v. Carlisle Light, Heat & Power Co. (Pa. 1919)
- City Ice Co. v. Easton Merchants' Ice Co. (Pa. 1919)
- Holden v. Llewellyn (Pa. 1918)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There is nothing in this case to take it out of the established rule that a preliminary injunction will not be disturbed where there was apparently sufficient ground for the action of the court below in awarding it. In the present case the learned chancellor said, in continuing the injunction, that, upon final hearing, when he would have the benefit of testimony on the part of the respondents, he might reach a different conclusion. Let the status quo remain until that hearing.
Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.