Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913

Hill's Estate

Hill's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided June 27, 1913 · Brown, Elkin, Mestrezat, Mosohzisker, Pee, Potter
242 Pa. 80; 88 A. 878; 1913 Pa. LEXIS 840

Hill's Estate

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

It will serve no good purpose to recite the undisputed facts upon which the court below surcharged the appellant. It is sufficient to say they left him no escape from the decree made. Every opportunity was given him to relieve himself, if he could, from the consequences which have resulted from his unfaithfulness as trustee, but he failed to do so, and the decree must, therefore, be affirmed.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.