Ruse v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Ruse v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Opinion of the Court
The errors assigned relate to the measure of damages,
The loss of earning power, as an element of damage, must be proved as any other fact, but such proof need not be clear and indubitable as to the extent of loss to entitle it to go to the jury: Simpson v. Railroad, 210 Pa. 101. It is rarely that the proof is as satisfactory as that offered by the plaintiff in this case, which was of a fixed salary before injury and inability to earn anything afterwards. The case was submitted in a manner to fully protect the rights of the defendant and we find no error in the record.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.