Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 253 Pa. 126 (Pa. 1916)
97 A. 1028; 1916 Pa. LEXIS 797
Brown, Mestrezat, Moscitzisker, Potter, Walling

Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The only assignments of error which are in compliance *127with our rules relate to the charge of the court, and the only complaint of counsel for appellant in their brief argument is of it, but, as no special or general exception was taken to it, the assignments cannot be considered: Foley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 240 Pa. 169.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
Practice, Supreme Court — Assignments of error — Error in charge —Failure to except. An assignment of error complaining of the charge of the Court will not be considered where no special or general exception was taken thereto.