Shoub v. Dunbar
Shoub v. Dunbar
Opinion of the Court
The agreement of appellants was to convey to appellee a lot of 'ground “free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.” Although Federal Lane has never' been opened through the land owned by pláintiffs, it was none the less a public highway: Commonwealth v. McNaugher et al., 131 Pa. 55. That portion of it was vacated by an.ordinance of the City of Pittsburgh, passed June 16, 1910,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Shoub et ux. v. Dunbar
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Beal estate — Sales of real estate — Titles—Encumbrances. On a case stated to determine the validity of the title to land which plaintiffs had agreed to convey to defendant “free and clear of all liens and encumbrances” but which defendant refused to accept, where it appeared that owing to the vacation of a,part of the land for a public street benefits might be assessed against it, the court properly entered judgment for defendant.