Clearkin v. Taheny
Clearkin v. Taheny
256 Pa. 615; 100 A. 1053; 1917 Pa. LEXIS 670
Clearkin v. Taheny
Opinion of the Court
By the decree of the court below the appellant is fully protected against all claims, suits, actions and demands of the unpaid creditors of the partnership. Under the facts properly found by the learned referee he has no further interest in the assets of the same, and the proper decree was that the ownership and title to the properties involved should be vested absolutely in the appellee.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.