Bixler v. Swartz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Bixler v. Swartz, 257 Pa. 300 (Pa. 1917)
101 A. 647; 1917 Pa. LEXIS 728
Cueiam, Frazer, Mestrezat, Moscitzisker, Potter, Walling
Bixler v. Swartz
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order of the court below continuing a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs’ possession of a store room in the City of Easton and from instituting or proceeding with any summary action at law for that purpose. We have carefully considered the facts disclosed by the record, and think there were reasonable grounds for the action of the court below, and, therefore, in accordance with our established practice we will not, on this appeal, further consider the merits of the case.
The appeal is dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
Reference
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Equity — Appeals—Injunction—Preliminary injunction— Landlord and tenant — Interference with lease. An order continuing a preliminary injunction restraining defendant from interfering witb plaintiff’s possession of a store room and from instituting or proceeding witb any summary action at law for tbe recovery of possession, will not be disturbed on appeal where it appears from tbe record that plaintiffs were in lawful occupancy under a lease, and that defendant was threatening to'oust them.