Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917

May's Estate

May's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided June 30, 1917 · Brown, Moschzisker, Potter, Stewart, Walling
259 Pa. 115; 102 A. 422; 1917 Pa. LEXIS 527

May's Estate

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The provision in the will of the testatrix for Mary E. McManemy, now Mary E. Mulliken, was for income only, and, with the codicil’s revocation of that provision* there was, as the court below correctly held, an intestacy as to such income, without affecting the testamentary disposition of the corpus or principal from which it accrued : Reiehard’s App., 116 Pa. 232.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.