Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918

Brumbaugh v. Raystown Water Power Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 25, 1918 · Brown, Frazer, Moschzisker, Potter, Stewart

260 Pa. 365; 103 A. 656; 1918 Pa. LEXIS 521

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Commonwealth v. Mehring (York County Court of Quarter Sessions 1923)
Kelly v. Scranton Railway Co. (Pa. 1921)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The sole .complaint of the appellant is of the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial for alleged improper remarks of counsel for plaintiff in addressing the *366jury. No objection was made to them by counsel for defendant at the time they were uttered, and the learned trial judge instructed the jury to disregard them. It was too late for the defendant to complain of them for the first time after a verdict unsatisfactory to it had been rendered, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.