Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919

Farrell v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.

Farrell v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 4, 1919 · Brown, Fox, Frazer, Simpson, Walling
263 Pa. 221; 106 A. 198; 1919 Pa. LEXIS 402

Farrell v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The complaint of the appellant is that this case was submitted to a jury. No complaint is made of the charge if it was for their consideration, and there ;is no assignment alleging error in the admission or rejection of testimony. That the injuries sustained by the appellee resulted from the collision of appellant’s automobile bus, in which she was riding, with a truck, was a fact fairly to be found from the testimony, and that the question of the negligence of appellant’s chauffeur as the cause of the collision was for the jury clearly appears in the opinion of the learned court below denying the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.