City Ice Co. v. Easton Merchants' Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
City Ice Co. v. Easton Merchants' Ice Co., 265 Pa. 310 (Pa. 1919)
108 A. 593; 1919 Pa. LEXIS 546
Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Simpson, Walling

City Ice Co. v. Easton Merchants' Ice Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from a preliminary injunction. As there was apparently sufficient ground for the action of the court below, we will not, under our established practice, consider the merits of the case at this stage of it, and the status quo will not be disturbed, but will be continued to final hearing: Gemmell et al. v. Fox et al., 241 Pa. 146; Hoffman v. Howell, 242 Pa. 112; Bixler v. Swartz, 257 Pa. 300.

Appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Reference

Full Case Name
City Ice Company v. Easton Merchants' Ice Company
Status
Published
Syllabus
Practice, Supreme Court — Appeals—Preliminary injunction — Consideration of merits. On an appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction the Supreme Court will not consider the merits of the case where there was apparently sufficient ground for the action of the lower court.