Ambrose v. Coxe Bros. & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Ambrose v. Coxe Bros. & Co., 266 Pa. 536 (Pa. 1920)
109 A. 642; 1920 Pa. LEXIS 607
Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Walling

Ambrose v. Coxe Bros. & Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

On appeal from an award by a referee of compensation to the appellee for the death of her husband, the compensation board, in a hearing de novo, found as a fact that his death had been hastened by injuries which he sustained in 1916, while in the employ of the appellant. On appeal to the court below and here the complaint of the appellant is that the evidence did not justify that finding. It is sufficient to say that the evidence is not before us, and the finding of the board under the statute is conclusive: Poluskiewicz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company, 257 Pa. 305.

Appeal dismissed and award affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ambrose v. Coxe Brothers & Co., Inc.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
Workmen’s Compensation Act — Findings of fact by Workmen’s Compensation Board — Conclusiveness—Securing de novo — Evidence —Appeals—Act of June 2,1915, P. L. 736. An appeal from an order of the court of common pleas affirming a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in a hearing de novo, does not bring the evidence before the appellate court, and the findings of facts by the hoard are conclusive.