Bryn Mawr Trust Co. v. Baldt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania March 8, 1920

Bryn Mawr Trust Co. v. Baldt, 268 Pa. 237 (Pa. 1920)

111 A. 712; 1920 Pa. LEXIS 663

Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Moscitzisker, Simpson, Walling

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The first, second and fourth assignments of error are not in accordance with our rules, as they fail to set forth the order of which they complain. The third is to a portion of the opinion of the court below in passing upon defendants’ motion for judgment, but the order of the court on that motion is not disclosed by the assignment. As no one of the assignments disclosed anything to be reviewed, the appeal must be quashed, and it is so ordered.

Appeal quashed.

Reference

Full Case Name: Bryn Mawr Trust Co., Admr. v. Baldt et ux.
Status: Published
Syllabus: Appeals — Assignments of error — Quoting record — Practice, Supreme Court — Quashing appeal. Assignments of erroT to the action of the court below in granting a motion for judgment n. o. v., in not dismissing the same, and in entering judgment for defendant without setting forth the order, are not in accordance with the rules, and will not be considered. An assignment of error merely quoting a portion of the opinion of the court below, in passing upon defendant’s motion for judgment, without disclosing the order made by the court, does not comply with the rules, and will not be considered. -