Wilson v. Hill
Wilson v. Hill
133 A. 926; 286 Pa. 318; 1926 Pa. LEXIS 550
Wilson v. Hill
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff was seriously injured through negligence of defendant; he recovered a verdict for $5,000, on which, after its reduction to $4,000, the court below entered judgment. Defendant has appealed and contends only that the verdict is so excessive that we should reverse the court below for not granting a new trial. After reading the evidence on the question involved, we are not convinced of reversible error.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.