Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
161 A. 410; 306 Pa. 194; 1932 Pa. LEXIS 420
Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Opinion of the Court
We are of opinion that this is not a ease “clear and free from doubt,” this being so, the order discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. (No. 2), 302 Pa. 329, 331; Sharples v. Northampton Trans. Co., 303 Pa. 211, 212; Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225; Penna. Co. for Insurances, etc., v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44.
The order of the court below is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.