Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 161 A. 410 (Pa. 1932)
306 Pa. 194; 1932 Pa. LEXIS 420
Frazer, Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew

Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that this is not a ease “clear and free from doubt,” this being so, the order discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. (No. 2), 302 Pa. 329, 331; Sharples v. Northampton Trans. Co., 303 Pa. 211, 212; Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225; Penna. Co. for Insurances, etc., v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Windisch, Appellant, v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published