Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947

Laposta v. Himmer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 2, 1947 · Appeal · Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Stearne, Jones

55 A.2d 751; 358 Pa. 69; 1947 Pa. LEXIS 480 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Sanford M. Chilcote , with him Dickie, Robinson McCamey , for defendant, appellants. E. V. Buckley , with him Mercer Buckley , for plaintiff, appellee. Samuel W. Pringle , with him Dalzell, McFall, Pringle Bredin , for additional defendant, appellee.

Opinion of the Court

■Pee Curiam,

All of the alleged errors covered by the appellants’ assignments on this appeal were painstakingly considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court en banc. As nothing is to be gained by Our reiterating either the facts or the law, the judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kennedy for the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.