Pew Trust
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cunningham Estate (Pa. 1959)
- Estate of Pew (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994)
- Pew Trust (Pa. 1963)
- Estate of Tyler (Pa. 1977)
- Arrott Estate (Pa. 1966)
- Norvell Estate (Pa. 1964)
- Catherwood Trust (Pa. 1961)
- Estate of Reynolds (Pa. 1981)
- Tyler Trusts (Pa. 1972)
- Reznor Estate (Pa. 1965)
- Pew Trust (Pa. 1960)
- Warden Trust (Pa. 1955)
- PEDF v. Com. of PA (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2019)
- Steel Estate (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court 1964)
- Kostenbader Trust (Berks County Orphans' Court 1964)
- Drexel Estate (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court 1961)
- Catherwood Estate (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court 1960)
- Klauder Estate (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court 1959)
- Silverman Trust (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court 1957)
- Conway Trust (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1957)
- Cunningham Estate (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court 1957)
- Mereto Estate (Montgomery County Orphans' Court 1956)
- Rice Estate (Montgomery County Orphans' Court 1956)
- Fownes Trust (Allegheny County Orphans' Court 1955)
- Hottel Estate (Bucks County Orphans' Court 1953)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
*469 These are appeals from a decree of an orphans’ court. The account was by trustees of an inter vivos trust. Exceptions of the life tenants to the adjudication were sustained, while those of the remaindermen and of the trustees were dismissed. These appeals followed.
By sustaining the life tenants’ exceptions and dismissing those of the remaindermen, the court below correctly determined that the provisions of the Uniform Principal and Income Act of May 3,1945, P. L. 416, 20 PS 3471, and the Principal and Income Act of July 3, 1947, P. L. 1283, 20 PS 3470, are unconstitutional when applied retroactively to trusts created prior to their enactments: See Crawford Estate, 362 Pa. 458, 67 A. 2d 124.
In dismissing the trustees’ exceptions, the learned court below ruled that it was unnecessary to decide, as an additional reason for sustaining exceptions to the adjudication, that the Acts of 1945 and 1947, supra, also impaired the obligation of the contract creating the trust, thus contravening Art. I, Section 17 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania and Art. I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States. We agree with this conclusion.
Decree affirmed. Costs to be paid out of the corpus of the trust fund.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.