Platt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commonwealth v. DiGiacomo (Pa. 1975)
- Commonwealth v. Seville (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979)
- Rue v. K-Mart Corp. (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997)
- McCloskey v. New York Life Insurance (Pa. Super. Ct. 1981)
- Glover v. Com., Dept. of Transp. (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994)
- Commonwealth v. Hemingway (Pa. 1987)
- Williams v. McClain (Pa. 1987)
- Wareham v. Jeffes (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1987)
- Pothier v. Commonwealth (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1986)
- Ganster v. Western Pennsylvania Water Co. (Pa. 1985)
- Morris v. Moss (Pa. Super. Ct. 1981)
- Commonwealth v. Campbell (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976)
- Commonwealth v. Mobley (Pa. 1973)
- Fauceglia v. Harry (Pa. 1962)
- Karasciewicz v. Crown Can Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 1958)
- Kizirian v. United Benefit Life Insurance (Pa. 1956)
- Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company (Ala. 1954)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for defendant non obstante veredicto in a suit by a beneficiary against an insurance company on its policy which insured, the life of plaintiff’s husband. Judgment was entered for defendant because the uncontradicted documentary evidence established false and fraudulent statements made by the insured in the insurance application, upon which the insurer relied in issuing the policy.
The policy was issued on April 24, 1943. Insured died within three months thereafter on July 3, 1943. The cause of death was “a respiratory arrest,” with contributing cause “widespread ulcerative caseous tuberculosis bilateral,” which, in lay language, is an advanced state of tuberculosis.
In answering, in the negative, questions in the application, the insured denied, and did not disclose, that he had been medically treated and hospitalized for tuberculosis. The undisputed evidence established that he was aware of the nature of his illness. At one time he was admitted to the hospital after he had “expectorated about a cupful of bright blood and clots.” The official hospital records disclose his numerous admissions to the hospital, the diagnosis and treatment for tuberculosis. That the insured’s statements were false, and he knew them to be false, cannot be doubted from an examination of this undisputed documentary evidence. This pre *654 eludes recovery: Freedman v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, 342 Pa. 404, 21 A. 2d 81; Prevete v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 343 Pa. 365, 22 A. 2d 691; Derr et al. v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, 351 Pa. 554, 41 A. 2d 542. The present factual situation differs from that where the insured suffered from an insidious and- latent disease of which he was unaware: Travellers Insurance Company v. Heppenstall Company, 360 Pa. 433, 61 A. 2d 809.
The hospital records were properly admitted as documentary evidence to show the fact of hospitalization, treatment prescribed and symptoms given; Act of May 4, 1939, P. L. 42, 28 PS, 91b; Freedman v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, supra, 412.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.