Zehr v. March
Zehr v. March
407 Pa. 471; 181 A.2d 428; 1962 Pa. LEXIS 605
Zehr v. March
Dissenting Opinion
Dissenting Opinion by
Since the petition to open judgment in this case did not contain and the defendants did not prove a meritorious defense, and since the failure on the part of defendants’ counsel to represent diligently the defendants has not been properly excused, I would reverse the action of the lower court in opening the judgment.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion
The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Forrest of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. ?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.