Commonwealth v. Trowery
Commonwealth v. Trowery
435 Pa. 586; 258 A.2d 499; 1969 Pa. LEXIS 760
Commonwealth v. Trowery
Opinion
Opinion
Petitioner was convicted of robbery and he appealed to the Superior Court, which affirmed. A petition for allocatur followed. The petition was prepared by petitioner; counsel has merely furnished a backer and a typist. This is clearly not the “representation in the role of an advocate” which we require. Commonwealth v. Stancell, 435 Pa. 301, 256 A. 2d 798 (1969).
The record is remanded to the hearing court so that counsel can file a proper petition for allocatur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.